Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernia Repair Research Articles

A case of indirect inguinal bladder hernia treated with laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair with high peritoneal incisional approach

BackgroundInguinal herniation of the urinary bladder is uncommon and those descending into the scrotum are even rarer. Although open anterior repair has been used for inguinal bladder hernia, the efficacy of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy has been reported in recent years.Case presentationA 63-year-old man presented with an irreducible right groin and scrotal bulge associated with voiding difficulty. Abdominal ultrasonography showed a dislocation of the urinary bladder descending into the right scrotum. Abdominal CT imaging revealed that a part of the bladder and small intestine was herniating into the scrotum through the internal inguinal ring and running laterally to the inferior epigastric artery. Under the diagnosis of indirect inguinal bladder hernia, the patient underwent trans-abdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP). The bladder herniated into the scrotum through the internal inguinal ring was replaced to the original position. Then the myopectineal orifice was exposed and covered with polypropylene mesh, where a horizontal peritoneal incision 4 cm above the hernia orifice, i.e., the high peritoneal incision approach (HPIA), allowed an easy peeling of the peritoneum and hernia sac. The patient’s postoperative course was uneventful and the voiding difficulty resolved. The patient continued to do well without recurrence at 20 months after surgery.ConclusionPreoperative evaluation with abdominal ultrasonography and CT scan allowed a precise diagnosis of a groin hernia with voiding difficulty. TAPP with HPIA was useful in the treatment of inguinal bladder hernia because this technique facilitated a quick confirmation of the hernia contents, secure dissection of the whole protruded bladder, and adequate replacement of the bladder to the original position without any injury.

Artificial Intelligence Assisted Recognition of Anatomical Landmarks and Laparoscopic Instruments in Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair.

Laparoscopic TAPP (Trans-Abdominal PrePeritoneal) is a minimally invasive surgical procedure used to repair inguinal hernias. Arguably, one important aspect to TAPP hernia repair is the identification of anatomical landmarks and the correct use of various laparoscopic instruments. There are very few studies regarding the use of artificial intelligence in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and more specifically in TAPP. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of AI in the recognition of anatomical landmarks and tools in laparoscopic TAPP videos. Imaging data have been exported from 20 Laparoscopic TAPP videos that have been performed by the authors and another 5 high quality TAPP videos from the internet (free access) performed by other surgeons. In total 1095 selected images have been exported for annotation. To accomplish the AI result of computer vision, the YOLOv8 model of deep learning was used. In total 2716 segmented areas of interest have been exported. The AI model was able to detect the various classes with a maximum F1 score of .82 when the confidence threshold was set to .406. The mAP50 was .873 for all classes. The Precision was above 50% when the confidence was over 10%. The Recall rate was above 50% when confidence was less than 70%. These results suggest that the model is effective at balancing precision and recall, capturing both true positives and minimizing false negatives. Artificial Intelligence recognition of anatomical landmarks and laparoscopic instruments in TAPP is feasible with acceptable success rates.

[Is vTAPP for small ventral hernias a potential «gold standard» for less than 24 hours hospitalization?]

To evaluate clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of vTAPP for small/M3W1 hernias compared to IPOM. We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively recruited group of patients. Study objects were patients undergoing ventral laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (vTAPP) for primary Midline/Lateral Small hernias up to 2 cm. The control group comprised patients after IPOM procedure. We analyzed 179 patients: vTAPP (n=132) and IPOM groups (n=47). The vTAPP group was characterized by significantly shorter hospitals-stay (Q1-Q3: 8-70 hours, p<0.001), fewer relapses (n=2, p=0.047) and slightly longer surgery (Q1-Q3: 40-80 min, p=0.037). Cost-effectiveness analysis revealed 3.39 times more profitable vTAPP compared to IPOM. Laparoscopic preperitoneal hernia repair is a safe and effective method not requiring special tools and consumables. This approach is applicable as an outpatient (or <24h hospital-stay) method.

[Da Vinci robotic complex in hernia repair surgery].

To review the first robotic hernia repairs performed at the Ilyinsky Hospital, evolution of this technology, learning curve and early outcomes. There were 17 procedures at the Ilyinskaya Hospital between 2021 and 2023 (13 men and 4 women). Mean age was 60 years, body mass index 28 kg/m2. ASA grade 1 was observed in 1 patient, grade 2 - 14 ones, grade 3 - 2 patients. Ventral, inguinal and umbilical hernias were diagnosed in 7, 8 and 2 cases, respectively. Ventral hernias required IPOM+ procedure in 3 cases, eTEP-RS procedure in 2 cases and eTEP-RS-TAR procedure in 2 cases. Patients with inguinal hernia underwent transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair. In case of umbilical hernia, TARUP procedure was performed in 1 case and vTAPP procedure in 1 case. Mean surgery time was 2 hours 38 min (min 1 hour 35 min, max 10 hours 11 min). There was one intraoperative complication (bleeding from epigastric artery). The follow-up period ranged from 3 months to 3 years. There were no recurrent hernias. Postoperative complications were noted in 2 cases. One patient was diagnosed with epididymitis after TAPP, 1 patient - with seroma after eTEP-RS procedure. All complications were relieved by conservative treatment. Bleeding from a. epigastrica inferior was diagnosed after removal of the trocar at the end of surgery. This event required suturing. Robotic hernia repair appears to be technically feasible and safe. This approach provides favorable results regarding quality of life and recurrence rate.

Transabdominal Pre-Peritoneal Versus Totally Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Techniques for Inguinal Hernia Repair in Eastern Nepal

Background: Inguinal hernia is one of the most common surgical problems in the world, with a high risk in men. The treatment modalities have evolved from open to laparoscopic procedures. Laparoscopic procedures are getting attention and widespread utilization among surgeons. The choice between the two procedures is still a debate between the surgeons. This study aims to compare the transabdominal pre-peritoneal approach to the totally extraperitoneal approach in its perioperative outcomes. Materials and Methods: A prospective analytical study was conducted on 86 adult patients, who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia reduction between June 2022 to June 2023 at Nobel Medical College Teaching Hospital in Biratnagar, Nepal. The patients were randomized into two groups of 43 participants each and were analyzed on different variables. Results: All of the 86 patients included in the study were male. Among them, 30.23% of patients had direct inguinal hernia. There were 12.79% of patients with bilateral hernias. There was a statistically significant difference in the duration of operation among the patients undergoing totally extraperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair. Total duration of hospital stay was shorter in totally extraperitonealand postoperative pain was slightly lesser in totally extraperitoneal procedure. The intraoperative and postoperative complications among totally extraperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair were comparable. There was no conversion to open procedure or recurrence of hernia during the study period. The return to daily life took longer in the transabdominal preperitoneal procedure than in the totally extraperitoneal hernia repair. Conclusion: Totally extraperitoneal hernia repairhas an advantage over transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repairin terms of shorter operative time, postoperative pain, duration of hospital stays, and return to daily life.

RAWS4all project: validation of a new silicone model for robotic TAPP inguinal hernia repair.

Trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) hernia repair is a complex procedure that presents several challenges. Even though, due to the high prevalence of inguinal hernia, TAPP technique is increasing in frequency and robotic Abdominal Wall Surgery (rAWS) is emerging as a valuable tool in this regard. Although inguinal TAPP procedure principles have been published and simulation is needed, the availability of validated models remains scarce. A new low-cost model was developed to simulate inguinal rTAPP repair. For validity assessment, a new TAPP-specific fidelity questionnaire and assessment scale were developed to compare the performance of novices and experts in the simulated procedure. The models used were assessed at 60min for execution and quality score. Twenty-five residents and specialists from all over the country participated in this study. Execution, quality, and global performance was higher in the seniors group compared to juniors (8.91 vs 6.36, p = 0.02; 8.09 vs 5.14, p < .001; and 17 vs. 11,5, p < .001, respectively). Overall fidelity was assessed as being very high [4.41 (3.5-5.0), α = .918] as well as face [4.31 (3.0-5.0), α = .867] and content validity [4.44 (3.2-5.0), α = .803]. Participants strongly agreed that the model is adequate to be used with the DaVinci® Robot [4.52 (3.5-5.0), α = .758]. This study shows face, content, and construct validity of the model for inguinal TAPP simulation, including for robotic surgery. Therefore, the model can be a valuable tool for learning, understanding, practicing, and mastering the TAPP technique prior to participating in the operating room.

Effects of TAPP Combined with Biological Mesh on Reproductive Function in Male Inguinal Hernia Patients of Reproductive Age: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Objective. To explore the effect of laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP) combined with biological mesh on the reproductive function of male inguinal hernia patients during the reproductive period. Methods. Sixty male inguinal hernia patients during the reproductive period admitted to our department from October 2015 to October 2021 were selected for retrospective analysis. All patients were treated with TAPP combined with biological mesh by the same team. Bilateral testicular volume, testicular temperature, testicular blood perfusion, peripheral serum testosterone concentration, and semen analysis were examined before surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, and 12 months after surgery. Results. The preoperative testicular volume, temperature, and blood perfusion were compared between the healthy side and the affected side; the testicular volume, temperature, blood perfusion of the affected side, peripheral blood testosterone concentration, and semen analysis were compared among the four time points, which were before operation, 3 months after operation, 6 months after operation, and 12 months after operation. All p values were &gt;0.05. Conclusions. The presence of inguinal hernia had no significant effect on the volume and blood perfusion of male testis. In addition, TAPP combined with biological mesh has no negative effect on postoperative reproductive function of male inguinal hernia patients of childbearing age, which manifested as a safe and feasible surgical method.

Robotic-assisted repair of incisional hernia—early experiences of a university robotic hernia program and comparison with open and minimally invasive sublay technique (eMILOS)

PurposeWith robotic surgical devices, an innovative tool has stepped into the arena of minimally invasive hernia surgery. It combines the advantages of open (low recurrence rates and ability to perform complex procedure such as transverse abdominis release) and laparoscopic surgery (low rate of wound and mesh infections, less pain). However, a superiority to standard minimally invasive procedures has not yet been proven. We present our first experiences of robotic mesh repair of incisional hernias and a comparison of our results with open and minimally invasive sublay techniques.MethodsA retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent robotic-assisted mesh repair (RAHR) for incisional hernia between April and November 2022 (RAHR group) and patients who underwent open sublay (Sublay group) or eMILOS hernia repair (eMILOS group) between January 2018 and November 2022 was carried out. Patients in the RAHR group were matched 1:2 to patients in the Sublay group by propensity score matching. Patient demographics, preoperative hernia characteristics and cause of hernia, intraoperative variables, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis of only midline hernia was performed.ResultsA total of 21 patients received robotic-assisted incisional hernia repair. Procedures performed included robotic retro-muscular hernia repair (r-RMHR, 76%), with transverse abdominis release in 56% of the cases. In one patient, r-RHMR was combined with robotic inguinal hernia repair. Two patients (10%) were operated with total extraperitoneal technique (eTEP). Robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (r-TAPP) was performed in three patients (14%).Median (range) operating time in the RAHR group was significantly longer than in the sublay and eMILOS group (291 (122–311) vs. 109.5 (48–270) min vs. 123 (100–192) min, respectively, p < 0.001). The meshes applied in the RAHR group were significantly compared to the sublay (mean (SD) 529 ± 311 cm2 vs. 356 ± 231, p = 0.037), but without a difference compared to the eMILOS group (mean (SD) 596 ± 266 cm2). Median (range) length of hospital stay in the RAHR group was significantly shorter compared to the Sublay group (3 (2–7) vs. 5 (1–9) days, p = 0.032), but not significantly different to the eMILOS group. In short term follow-up, no hernia recurrence was observed in the RAHR and eMILOS group, with 9% in the Sublay group. The subgroup analysis of midline hernia revealed very similar results.ConclusionOur data show a promising outcome after robotic-assisted incisional hernia repair, but no superiority compared to the eMILOS technique. However, RAHR is a promising technique especially for complex hernia in patients with relevant risk factors, especially immunosuppression. Longer follow-up times are needed to accurately assess recurrence rates, and large prospective trials are needed to show superiority of robotic compared to standard open and minimally invasive hernia repair.

Is It Safe to Perform Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernia Repair Simultaneously?

Abstract Background/Aims: Cholecystectomy and inguinal hernia repair are the most common operations in general surgery. With the laparoscopic approach, the risk of postoperative pain and infection is lower, patients can return to their daily activities in a shorter time, and the cosmetic appearance is better. However, surgical procedures in which laparoscopic cholecystectomy and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP) are performed simultaneously are limited. The safety of this procedure is questioned in this article. Methods: The records of 38 patients who had undergone simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy and TAPP were retrospectively reviewed, and patient demographic characteristics, indications for surgery, parameters associated with surgery, and postoperative complications were elicited. Results: The mean age of the patients was 48 ± 6.7 years, the youngest patient was 32 years old, and the oldest patient was 68 years old. The average operation time of the patients was 124 ± 26 minutes, and the average postoperative hospital stay was 2.1 ± 0.4 days. As for intraoperative complications, bleeding due to a double cystic artery in one patient, and perforation of the gallbladder in one patient were observed. In the postoperative period, one patient was found to have a seroma in the hernia area (in the patient with gallbladder perforation), and one patient had a recurrence in the hernia area in the late phase. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that laparoscopic cholecystectomy and TAPP surgery could be safely performed simultaneously. The results of our study also include that prioritizing cholecystectomy does not increase the mesh infection rate.

Return to Work in Patients With Unilateral Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Approach and Lichtenstein Tension-Free Mesh Repair.

Objective The objective of this prospective cohort study was to compare the time to return to work between patients who underwent laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair and those who underwent Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair with mesh for unilateral inguinal hernia. Methodology Patients were registered for unilateral inguinal hernia review at Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from May 2016 to April 2017 and followed till April 2020. All patients aged 16-65 planned for unilateral transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair or Lichtenstein tension-free hernia mesh repair were included. Patients with bilateral inguinal hernia repair, limited activity, or above retirement age were excluded. A non-probability consecutive sampling technique was implemented, and patients were divided into two cohort groups: Group A underwent laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair, while Group B underwent Lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair. Patients were followed up at one week to inquire about the resumption of activities and then at one and three years for recurrence. Results Sixty-four patients met the inclusion criteria; three patients opted out of research, and 61 patients agreed to participate; one patient was excluded due to the conversion of the procedure. The remaining 30 in Group A and 30 in Group B were followed for the study period. The mean time to return to work in Group A was 5.33 ± 4.46 days; in Group B, it was 6.83 ± 4.58 days, with a p-value of 0.657.One recurrence was observed at three years in Group A. Conclusion Although the time to return to work at our hospital was slightly shorter in laparoscopic hernia repair than in the open technique, the results were not statistically significant. In addition, there was no significant difference in hernia recurrence at the one-year follow-up between laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair and Lichtenstein tension-free hernia mesh repair for unilateral inguinal hernia.

P-036 SUTURING OF THE INTERNAL INGUINAL ORIFICE DURING THE LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSABDOMINAL REPAIR OF A LARGE INDIRECT INGUINAL HERNIA

Abstract Aim To present the rationale and surgical technique of the internal inguinal orifice suturing during transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair of large inguinal hernias. Methods The surgical steps of a laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP) with the addition of the suturing reconstruction of the internal orifice are presented. Results A 52-year-old man presented with a large symptomatic right inguinal hernia. A TAPP repair was performed. Due to a significantly widened internal inguinal orifice, reconstruction of the deep ring was performed by suturing the transversalis fascia arc to the iliopubic tract with a self-locking 2-0 stitch in a continuous fashion. Accordingly, a medium-weighted polyester mesh was applied. The patient had an uneventful postoperative period, without symptoms of chronic pain or discomfort at a 6-month follow-up. Conclusions During the laparoscopic repair of large indirect inguinal hernias, suturing reconstruction of the internal orifice, similar to the common practice for open inguinal hernia repair, may reduce mesh eventration and recurrence.

P-077 LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL HERNIA REPAIR (TAPP): OUR EXPERIENCE IN 200 PATIENTS

Abstract Aim To review and report our experience in the laparoscopic hernia treatment. Material &amp; Methods It's a retrospective observational study including all patients who underwent a laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP) in our hospital between January 2016 to April 2022. Results From a total of 190 patients, 92% were male with a median age of 55,7 years old. Most of the cases were a primary hernia repair (81%) and 51,6% had bilateral presentation. Regarding the type of mesh employed, 89,1% were Adhesix®, 7,5% were Progrip® and 3,2% were flat polypropylen meshes. Tackers were used to fix the mesh only in a 11,2% of the patients. To close the peritoneum flap an absorbable barbed suture was used in a 94% of the cases, while tackers in a 5,9%. No intra-operative complications were described and 91,5% of surgeries were performed on an outpatioent basis. Concerning complications on the first fllow-up month: 7 patients suffered pain (3,4%) and 7 hematoma/seroma. Long-term complications were: chronic pain in 4 patients (2 with Adhesix®, 1 Progrip®, the forth one unknown; in none of them tackers were used); recurrence happened in 14 patients (7,6%) (11 Adhesix®, 2 Progrip®, 1 flat polypropylen mesh; tackers were used in three of these patients to fix the mesh). Conclusions Adhesix® mesh was the most employed (89,1%) and the one with the lowest recurrence rate (6,6%). According to our experience, tackers aren't necessary when an auto-adhesive mesh is used. Although they weren't related with postoperative pain, they didn't seem to prevent recurrence eiher.

V-009 Robot-Assisted Repair of a Traumatic Hernia After a Pelvic Fracture: Case Report and Literature Review

Abstract Aim Traumatic abdominal wall hernias (TAWH) are an uncommon clinical entity, accounting for less than 0.2% of all blunt trauma injuries. Management and operative technique are still a matter of debate and the role of the robotic surgical platform in traumatic hernias has not been reported on. We present a robot-assisted repair of a TAWH through a fracture of the left iliac wing. We aim to describe our operative approach and perform a review of the literature. Material and methods A 46-year-old male with a history of a high energetic trauma presented with a symptomatic swelling in the left lumbar region. Further imaging showed an important defect of the abdominal wall caused by a disruption of the iliac and gluteus muscles and non-union of a left iliac wing fracture. This caused a herniation of the descending colon. A robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP) with synthetic mesh was performed in elective setting. Results The postoperative course was uneventful. Discharge was possible at postoperative day one. There was no surgical site infection, seroma, or recurrence after a follow-up period of 6 months. Conclusions To our knowledge, we describe the first robot-assisted repair of a TAWH through a pelvic fracture. Our technique was safe and feasible. In difficult to reach areas of the abdomen, a robot-assisted repair might be a valid approach. Larger studies are needed to confirm our initial experience in traumatic abominal wall hernia surgery.

Quality of Life after Desarda Technique for Inguinal Hernia Repair-A Comparative Retrospective Multicenter Study of 120 Patients.

Inguinal hernia repair, according to Desarda, is a pure tissue surgical technique using external oblique fascia to reinforce the posterior wall of the inguinal canal. This has provided an impetus for the rethinking of guideline adherence toward minimally invasive and mesh-based surgery of inguinal hernia. In this study, a retrospective analysis of this technique was conducted in two German hospitals. Between 6/2013 and 12/2020, 120 operations were performed. Analysis included patient characteristics, duration of operation, length of hospital stay, and perioperative complications. Data were used to achieve a matched-pair analysis comparing Desarda to laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair. Propensity scores were calculated based on five preoperative variables, including sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiology classification, localization, and width of the inguinal hernia in order to achieve comparability. Additionally, we assessed pain level and quality of life (QoL) 12 months postoperatively. The focus of our study was a comparison of QoL to a reference population and TAPP cohort. The study population consisted of 106 male and 14 female patients, and the median age was 37.5 years. The median operation time was 50 min, and the median length of hospital stay was 2 days. At a follow-up of 17 months, the median recurrence rate was 0.8%, and two cases of chronic postoperative pain were recorded. Postoperative QoL does not significantly differ between Desarda and TAPP. In contrast, Desarda patients had a significantly higher QoL compared with the reference population. In summary, Desarda's procedure is a good option as a pure tissue method for inguinal hernia repair.

A case report of a 5 mm trocar-site evisceration after transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair

A case report of a 5 mm trocar-site evisceration after transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair

One-year experience of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal approach in a single institute: 2 different surgeons with different levels of experience.

The robotic platform, an extension of minimally invasive procedures, is distributed nationwide and readily available. However, its application in inguinal hernia repair seems rare in Korea. This report aims to share our initial experience with robotic inguinal hernia repair. The patients who underwent robotic inguinal hernia repair by 2 different surgeons with different experiences at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The surgical procedures were performed on all patients using the Da Vinci Xi robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical Inc). Patient demographics, operation variables, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. A total of 35 patients underwent robotic inguinal hernia repairs consecutively. The mean age was 55.03 ± 18.20 years. The majority of patients were male. The overall mean operation time was 103.98 ± 47.92 minutes for unilateral hernia surgery and 139.28 ± 46.07 minutes for bilateral surgery. None of the patients experienced intraoperative complications. However, postoperative complications were noticed in 8 patients: 3 with seroma formation, 1 with hematoma, 1 with superficial surgical site infection, and 3 with persistent pain at the operation site. This report demonstrates an early experience of hernia surgery using the robotic platform. The robotic approach for transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair was completed without any significant intraoperative or postoperative complications. It may be a viable option as a minimally invasive technique. Cost-effectiveness, optimal procedural steps, and indications for the robotic approach remain to be further investigated.

Comparison of open preperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair for primary unilateral femoral hernia: a retrospective cohort study of 132 case.

Femoral hernia (FH) is traditionally treated by open surgery (OS). Laparoscopic treatment has also shown good results in treating FH. However, there have been few comparative studies of these two techniques. Therefore, our aim was to compare the outcomes of open and laparoscopic surgical FH treatment. Adult patients with primary unilateral FH undergoing OS or transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair at our hospital from January 2013 to June 2018 were included in this study. Patients with history of abdominal surgery, contraindications to general anesthesia and those not wishing to receive general anesthesia received OS. Demographics, operation details and complications were compared retrospectively between the two groups. A total of 132 patients were recruited to the study, 62 and 70 of whom underwent OS and TAPP, respectively. Compared to OS group, the TAPP group had a significantly shorter hospital stay (3.0 vs. 2.0days, respectively, P < 0.05) and a lower postoperative pain score (3.0 vs. 1.0, P < 0.05), and took less time to return to normal activities (13.0 vs. 6.0days, respectively, P < 0.05). The overall complication rates were equivalent between the groups (10 vs. 9.7%, OR = 1.037, 95% CI 0.329-3.270). Both laparoscopic and open surgery appear to be safe and effective in a cohort of patients with femoral hernia and laparoscopic surgery might offer some advantages in reducing length of hospital stay, lower postoperative pain score and quicker return to activities.

V-027 2-IN1: LAPAROSCOPIC TAPP REPAIR OF CONCURRENT SPIGELIAN AND INGUINAL HERNIAS

Abstract Aim Spigelian hernias are rare hernias of the abdominal wall and difficult to diagnose clinically. Our aim is to report a diagnostic and surgical challenge of the combination of inguinal and Spigelian hernias. Material &amp; Methods 74 year old female presented with pain in right inguinal region and lump in right iliac fossa. The ultrasound scan revealed right sided Spigelian hernia up to 4 cm, right inguinal hernia up to 1 cm and incidentally detected contralateral Spigelian hernia up to 3 cm on the left side. Results Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair was performed of both right Spigelian and ipsilateral inguinal hernias. The hernia sacs were dissected and 25×15 cm polypropylene mesh was placed, covering both hernia sites. The mesh was fixed using absorbable tacks. The peritoneum was closed using barbed suture. The repair of contralateral Spigelian hernia was planned as a second stage procedure due to the present comorbidities. Operation time was 140 min. The patient was discharged on the next postoperative day. Ultrasound scan performed after 3 weeks did not show any signs of seroma, hematoma or recurrence. Conclusions An accurate preoperative diagnosis of Spigelian and inguinal hernias led to the safe and successful laparoscopic repair with preperitoneal mesh placement.

SAFETY OF SIMULTANEOUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY IN COMBINATION WITH LAPAROSCOPIC HERNIA REPAIR (TAPP). A SERIES OF CLINICAL CASES

Aim: To evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of a simultaneous surgery: laparoscopic appendectomy in combination with transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair.Methods: The study was a retrospective analytical one. The medical histories were studied and postoperative monitoring of eleven patients hospitalized with acute appendicitis who underwent simultaneous surgery: laparoscopic appendectomy with simultaneous laparoscopic plastic surgery of clinically significant inguinal hernia was carried out. During the statistical analysis, the following parameters were evaluated: the timing of postoperative recovery, the frequency of early postoperative complications and the frequency of recurrence of inguinal hernia a year after surgery.Results: The surgery was successfully performed in all 11 patients. There were no cases of infectious complications of the surgical intervention area. Acute urinary retention was registered in one patient in the early postoperative period. In one case, an early adhesive intestinal obstruction was diagnosed, which was resolved with conservative treatment. There were no cases of recurrent inguinal hernia during the year.Conclusion: laparoscopic appendectomy in combination with transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair can be used in the treatment of acute appendicitis in combination with inguinal hernia in the absence of signs of gangrenous appendicitis with purulent peritonitis. The low statistical power of the study does not allow us to draw conclusions about the safety of this approach for patients of the older age group with a high comorbidity index.

A FEATURE OF LAPAROSCOPIC TREATMENT OF IRREDUCIBLE AND LARGE INGUINAL HERNIAS

Summary. Introduction. The inguinal hernia is one of the most common surgical problems around the world. Patients with large inguinal and inguinal hernias are a certain group. At present, there are no final convincing evidence of the advantage of laparoscopic hernia repair of complex forms of inguinal hernias, indications and contraindications to various methods of this operation, the technology of performing surgical interventions for various types of complex inguinal hernias has not been completed.&#x0D; Aim. Perform perioperative complications in surgical treatment of unrecognizable and large inguinal hernias with laparoscopic modified TAPP method, classic Laparoscopic TEP laparoscopic technique and inguinal canal plastic according to Lichtenstein.&#x0D; Materials and methods. Surgical treatment of 42 patients with unrecognizable and large inguinal hernias was performed. All of them were performed incapacitated plastic with the use of a prone grid. In 12 patients, the Lichtenstein (Lichtenstein group) was performed, 18 patients with a modified technique (TAPP group) and 12 — TEP (TEP group). Modification was a high resection of the hernia sac in patients with inguinal-callous hernia, and the techniques of digestion of the peritoneum with a fixed gut in cases where the intestine is tightly fictoned in a large length to the peritoneum in the area of the hernia sac.&#x0D; Results of the research. Application in the performance of transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair of the technique of high resection of the hernia sac in patients with inguinal-potassium hernia, and methods Surgery, reduce the frequency of hematoma and inflammatory processes in the TAPP surgery area is likely (p &lt; 0.05), and reduce the number of conversions in the TAPP group.&#x0D; Conclusions. Diagnostic laparoscopy is a necessary highly informative stage of diagnosis and determination of surgical tactics for complex types of inguinal hernias. Laparoscopic hernia repair of complex forms of inguinal hernias is a method of choice, which provides low trauma, asepticity, good conditions for wound healing. Modified technique of transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair of complex inguinal hernias, which reduced the trauma of the operation and thus reduce intra and postoperative complications that are manifested by the formation of hematoma and inflammatory processes in the surgery.